Pairing Mendelssohn’s Fifth Symphony, the so-called “Reformation Symphony”, and Bruckner’s Third Mass in F minor seemed to me at first a rather novel, but very interesting idea. It was perhaps not the most daring of programmes, but certainly a very interesting one, picking a symphony steeped in Protestant tradition and then a Catholic mass. In a way, the programme of Saturday’s concert with the Oslo Philharmonic seemed almost a tribute to ecumenicalism in general.
The concert started out with Mendelssohn’s Fifth Symphony. It was actually his second completed symphony, but due to Mendelssohn not being able to finish it for the planned première, it was not published until 21 years after Mendelssohn’s death, and thus it became his “fifth”. The symphony was written to mark the 300th anniversary of the Augsburg Confession, a key event during the Protestant Reformation. It also quotes church music, like the Dresden Amen, a motif that was famously used by Wagner as the Grail motif in Parsifal, and Martin Luther’s hymn “Ein feste Burg ist unser Gott” (“A mighty fortress is our God”).
The Oslo Philharmonic and their conductor Simon Gaudenz delivered a dramatic account of the first movement with plenty of forward momentum, almost veering on the side of too fast sometimes. But it was still a compelling performance with some very heroic playing from the brass. The forward momentum continued over into the second movement, a Scherzo, although it still provided a good contrast to the first movement, with playful woodwinds now dominating the sound. While it did feel a bit too “dancey” at times, it was nevertheless played with great precision, especially among the woodwinds. The third movement was more than capably played, but it felt like it was over almost before it had began. Although for this I think Mendelssohn is to blame rather than the Oslo Philharmonic.
The fourth movement was first and foremost characterised by an incredibly well-balanced orchestral sound, all the way from the opening chorale to the final one. And although the orchestra sounded great throughout, I would have really liked just a bit more brass during the final chorale. It really is one of those places where the brass should, if not drown the rest of the orchestra, then at least be heard way above the rest. One problem I found throughout the symphony was that softer dynamics seemed to be virtually non-existent, and while the orchestra’s loud playing was formidable, I would have liked to hear more dynamic contrast.
After intermission followed Bruckner’s Mass no. 3 in F minor. It is a relatively early piece, composed in 1868, a few years before the Second Symphony, but numerous revisions were made up until 1893, three years before his death. In addition to an orchestra, the mass features a chorus and four soloists.