Despite the swanky new opera house on Oslo’s waterfront, Norway has quite a way to go, operatically speaking. There is an uncomfortable number of key works that still haven’t seen any performances here. One of these key pieces is Debussy's only opera, Pelléas et Mélisande. At least it was, until it finally received its Norwegian première in a gripping production by Barbora Horáková Joly, 115 years after its first performance.
Originally, this production was to be the opera directing debut of Australian director Simon Stone, but he had to withdraw only a few months before opening, leaving the production to Czech director Barbora Horáková Joly. Joly did not seem to have time for the external trappings of the story – this was no medieval fantasy of caves, towers and mysterious heroines with impossibly long hair. Instead, the harshly lit, white tiled hospital walls of Ralph Myers’ set became the backdrop of the psychological exploration of a dysfunctional family on the verge of collapse.
The hospital setting lent the production an experimental feel: even though the central family were always in the foreground, they was always a doctor lurking in the background, observing. Around the central love triangle of Mélisande, Pelléas and his half-brother Golaud, the rest of the family tried to keep it together, with varying degrees of success. As Arkel, the family patriarch, Anders Lorentzson kept his dark bass remarkably beautiful, even as he violently tried to maintain control. Randi Stene’s voluptuously sung Geneviève, the mother of Pelléas and Golaud, was walking around in a cognac-induced stupor, teetering on the brink of collapse under her pale gold suit and perfectly coiffed hair. Golaud’s son Yniold, unsettlingly beautifully sung by boy soprano Aksel Rykkvin, showed an unhealthy fascination for dolls and archery, the purity of his voice belying his already traumatic upbringing.
The opera opened with a visibly traumatised Mélisande, her white dress caked with dirt, blood running down the inside of her thighs. There were also splatters of blood on Golaud’s shirt, although the reason for the blood was not readily apparent. What followed this opening scene was not a straightforward narrative; rather, events bleed together into a tapestry of confusion and unrest. Joly embraced the episodic nature of the opera, blurring the transitions between scenes and even acts, making them seem like fragmented memories, half lived, half reimagined. Only towards the end did the chronological erraticism begin to make sense, ending with an ambivalent, even borderline frightening image of life to come, despite parts of the audience happily cooing away.