At the end of Seattle Opera's previous production – a refreshing new staging of Handel's Semele – the ill-fated heroine is burned by Jupiter's glorious fire, but the god Bacchus emerges from her destruction: "born as my mother expired in the flames", as Hugo von Hofmannsthal has the wine god explain in his libretto for Ariadne auf Naxos.
So there was a neat bit of story continuation, as it were, in the company's season-closing production of Ariadne auf Naxos, in which Bacchus's sudden arrival provides the apotheosis: he rescues the abandoned Princess Ariadne from her suicidal despair. Ariadne was a revival of the production from 2004 for which director Chris Alexander won Seattle Opera's Artist of the Year award.
Robert Dahlstrom's set initially presents a busily trafficked, impromptu "backstage" area where the two groups commissioned to provide the evening's entertainment – a highbrow tragic opera alongside a farce – scurry about frantically as they make last-minute preparations. (The sight of stagehands coping with a clunky flat set for Ariadne's rocky desert isle is a bit reminiscent of an intermission feature from a Met in HD broadcast.)
But following this behind-the-scenes Prologue, the set is transformed into a tony gallery filled with Chihuly-esque glass sculptures and flanked by enormous abstract paintings. The performance proceeds as dinner guests watch from tables stationed on both sides of the stage. The gala has been financed by a Seattle-area Maecenas: say, a Microsoft mogul or an Amazon arriviste, who at the last minute has ordered the tragedy and the comic interlude to be performed simultaneously so as to avoid longueurs... and to ensure that the fireworks planned to crown the evening will not be delayed.
There's a longstanding tradition of 18th-century opera buffa shenanigans behind the meta-operatic premise of the Prologue, but Strauss and Hofmannsthal also anticipate postmodern attitudes in the deliberate confusion of genre of this third of their collaborations. And that poses Ariadne's key interpretive challenge: should its varied styles be construed simply as contradictions – an approach that tends to emphasise the comic – or is there a way to illuminate the sudden introduction of loftier musical rhetoric in both the Prologue and the staged opera without making it sound merely like parody? Is there, in the end, a relationship between the Composer's idealism (as projected onto his vision of Ariadne) and Zerbinetta's coy realism, a relationship deeper than comical incongruity?
Overall, Alexander's solution is to play up the comedy. He crowds the Prologue with witty stage business and motivates some genuinely funny physical movement from the cast. But after the clash of wills and personalities has been set up at length in the Prologue, he continues to harp repetitiously on the comic note in the main course. Continual vamping throughout Zerbinetta's big number, rendered as a cross between a sexy cabaret act and a cartoon with vaudeville clowning by her colleagues, distracts from anything beyond the surface layer. But an essential aspect of this opera's delicious irony is that for all her game artifice, Zerbinetta is the one who understands the transformation Ariadne must undergo: "When a newer god approaches, we surrender, silent..."