The last opera of the Mozart/Da Ponte cycle – the second of the composer’s operas to be performed in this Mozart-dominated season at the Royal Opera House – Così fan tutte pivots on two pairs of young lovers whose affection is put to the test by an old ‘philosopher’, Don Alfonso. Women, the old man argues, are all the same: never constant in their love, never loyal to their men. It takes three hours of musical comedy and a long list of artfully arranged expedients to demonstrate the sage’s maxim. Eventually, though, a moral emerges and everybody recites it: let’s take life with philosophy, let’s be reasonable and positive before its hardships. A hymn to pragmatism and resignation.
The present production, a revival – directed by Harry Fehr – of Jonathan Miller’s now ‘classic’ staging from 1995 (it was last seen on the ROH stage in 2010), sets the Mozart-Da Ponte plot in our modern, technological present (mobile phones, cameras and laptops populate it from the very beginning to the end). Miller flaunts a daring economy of set design and movement. One rather bare set – a large white room with cushions piled up at an angle on the floor, a shabby settee at the back and chairs scattered at the sides – serves throughout as the theatre of Mozart’s plot of farcical disguises. A door in fittingly sober neoclassical style forms the focal point from which the comings and goings of the characters (particularly Alfonso, the catalyst of the dramatic action) mark the progression from one scene to another. Immediately in front of the door stands a large mirror, which all the characters – willingly or unwillingly – bump into every time they enter and leave. The mirror’s symbolic meaning is clear: everybody here is too concerned about appearances. Disguise is achieved not only by means of the clothes that all the characters (except for Alfonso) keep changing; it underlies the very nature of Mozart’s characters. Paradoxically, it is only as the opera unfolds – as the young men’s masquerade is gradually played out – that the four lovers achieve some kind of personal (as well as musical) identity. All this is well conveyed in the current production: the kinship in character between the two women (often singing in thirds and sixths) is stressed by their complicity onstage; what is more, as they begin to give in to male advances, the mirror significantly starts throwing back less pleasing images (everybody now has something to feel ashamed of or be enraged about...).