Benjamin Britten’s 1954 opera The Turn of the Screw is a sensible choice for the New York City Opera: its chamber orchestration and emotional intimacy make it unsuitable for production by the Met Opera (against which every other company in town must define itself), and its claustrophobia would seem to offer a great opportunity for one of the company’s more innovative directors to create something creepy and unexpected. It also enjoys the name recognition to fill seats – which has, unfortunately, been an issue for the company’s more adventurous recent efforts. But while this production, which opened at the Brooklyn Academy of Music on Sunday afternoon, offers a step forward in musical values from some of the company’s other recent efforts, it doesn’t really do this striking work justice.
Adapted from Henry James’s novella of the same title, The Turn of the Screw deals with Britten’s favorite themes of childhood and the loss of innocence, this time in the Gothic setting of an isolated English country house. Sam Buntrock’s production (design by David Farley) is at its best in the beginning. As a narrator known as Prologue explains the situation – a Governess is assigned to watch over two orphaned children and must not report back to their guardian on their progress – we see the eager Governess meet with the mysterious figure of the guardian. Then she steps forward, the curtain falls, and we see her nervous drive to the house, in front of a projection that seems to recall an Alfred Hitchcock movie.
But while the clothes look to be updated to the 1960s, later we learn, via TV footage of the Falklands War and a few too many Star Wars references, that it is actually the early 1980s. While a retro horror thriller atmosphere seems to have potential, Buntrock’s literal-minded production doesn’t do the work many favors. The two-level set’s most effective elements are a series of raising and lowering lamps, and door and window frames define the spaces effectively enough.
But both the design and direction are a clumsy mix of gratuitous clutter (such as Miles’ Star Wars-inspired bedroom and a constantly flickering TV in the living room) and minimalism (those window frames), when the work’s stark mystery seems to demand a stronger, more abstract, and more serious hand. (I could not help but think of Buntrock’s 2012 production of John Guare’s tiresomely wacky play Are You There, McPhee?, similarly a ghost story set a few decades ago. But the stark Screw has little in common with Guare’s dramaturgical diarrhoea.)
The ghosts of the children’s previous caretakers, Peter Quint and Miss Jessel, both appear as zombies. Their stringy hair and Quint’s blood-spattered face look more hokey than suggestive, nor are their matter-of-fact entrances convincingly shocking. Buntrock often leaves the singers to fend for themselves, with stage pictures often turning static, and leaves us with a simple ghost story with few actual scares. While many have suggested that the Governess is only imagining the other characters, Buntrock does nothing to suggest this further ambiguity. We don’t really figure out what Quint and Jessel are after, but being haunted by zombies who rise out of trapdoors in Brooklyn leaves rather too little to the imagination.