Briniging together the Paris Opera Ballet, New York City Ballet and the Bolshoi Ballet companies for this celebration of fifty years of Balanchine’s Jewels was a coup for outgoing Lincoln Center Festival director Nigel Redden. It’s widely accepted (even though Balanchine refuted it) that the traditions these three companies represent are embodied in Emeralds, Rubies and Diamonds, respectively. On this occasion, NYCB and the Bolshoi switched places with the Russians dancing Rubies and the Americans performing Diamonds.. Understandably, this engagement was the hottest ticket of the dance season in New York City.
Until this performance, Emeralds had always been my least favorite of the Jewels. The Paris Opera Ballet threw all its weight behind this, casting étoiles and premiers danseurs in all the leading roles and they are terrific dancers. The French do ballet differently. There is a luscious softness to their port de bras and a refined containment to their movement. Their very muscles seem smoother. Americans seem almost sinewy in comparison. This is not to say one is better than the other but in Emeralds, a ballet about lyricism, the Parisians completely won me over. Dorothée Gilbert and Hugo Marchand were exemplary. Gilbert is awesomely powerful on pointe as well as sublimely soft in her upper body. She moved through her balances like a lingering musical sigh that time and again drew my attention to how much this ballet is about the artistry of the upper body. Léonore Baulac’s solo had many steps performed facing away from the audience and it was a revelation of how exquisite a dancer’s back can be. French épaulement is like no other with its inexpressibly graceful twist. The men, Hugo Marchand, Germain Louvet and Marc Moreau all moved with incredible, feathery lightness. After many performances of anxiously waiting for Emeralds to end so the rest of the program could go on, this was a real revelation. I was transported to a sylvan glade and for once, I was in no hurry to leave. I won’t look at this ballet the same way again.
Rubies did not fare well in the hands and feet of the Bolshoi. Balanchine famously said that dance is music made visible but it was hard to see that in lead couple Ekaterina Krysanova and Artem Ovcharenko. They were lagging in getting to the positions that create a momentary picture, a snapshot, that illuminates a musical moment. The result was that they were moving through positions and it muddied the visual representation of the music. Ovcharenko’s jogging solo was off the mark as he was too balletic, not athletic enough. They also goofed around too much, treating the running, skipping rope and other Americanisms like a comedy routine rather than as play. As the tall girl, Yulia Grebenschikova was too soft in the middle and didn’t convey the inner Amazonian that this role requires. The Russian corps de ballet was great here and the leads are wonderful dancers but this is not their natural métier. There’s just no reasonable comparison between the dancers in this ballet and the Russians came up short.