For one of their final performances at this summer’s Tanglewood Festival, the Boston Symphony Orchestra and Andris Nelsons scheduled a performance of Mahler’s Symphony no. 3 in D minor, one of the most challenging orchestral works in the repertoire... for both musicians interpreting it and for listeners. The difficulties are not necessarily related to handling the immense instrumental and choral apparatus in an opus of extreme length. Composed in 1895-1896, during Mahler’s summer vacations in Steinbach, on the shores of the Attersee, the symphony is divided into two asymmetrical parts and six movements, each having initially an explanatory title that the author later gave up. It ends with a slow, hymn-like, pensive movement rather than a conventionally uplifting one. The shorter middle sections are not moments of respite between the huge first and last but, as Nelsons made very clear, ascending steps towards a clear goal.
The first movement, uncharacteristically composed last, contains references to the later ones that have to be underlined. In a worthy interpretation, this huge movement must maintain, as the only component of the first part, its relative independence and also satisfy its role in the architectural structure. The music is full of contrasts, of Yin-Yang elements that must be both brought forward and resolved into a higher order synthesis. Keeping, as always, a keen eye on details of timbre and dynamics, Nelsons almost fully succeeded in performing a difficult balancing act. The music in the huge initial section constantly oscillated between gay and tragic, suave and exuberant, aggressive marches and deeply felt suggestions of funeral processions. In a performance that was far from being “cool” and detached, edges were sharp, the Latvian conductor making no attempt to smooth them out. Neither was the Tempo di Minuetto walk among blooming flowers overly prettified. In the third movement, the transformation of the concrete trumpet sound into the mysterious, atemporal posthorn reverberations was almost magical. So were occasional “conversations” between very precise beats and seemingly indefinite, floating ones.
Mahler’s Third is, as much as anything else, a showcase for individual contributions within the orchestral ensemble. Interventions by First Associate Concertmaster Tamara Smirnova, Principal Oboe John Ferrillo or Principal Flute Elizabeth Rowe were outstanding but conform with the traditions of Romantic scores. Mahler introduced marvelous thematic material for brass instruments in this work and multiple solos by Toby Oft (trombone) and Thomas Rolfs (posthorn) were those that truly captivated the listeners’ attention. They were not necessarily remarkable for their accuracy but for their amazing, almost human voice-like legatos.