The countertenor voice seems to polarise opinion like no other - you either love it or hate it, there is little middle ground - and even amongst the aficionados (in whose number I count myself), there can be strong, almost tribal allegiances to one school or another and sometimes to individual proponents. The two on stage at the Barbican yesterday evening nearly (though not quite) represented opposing camps, but provided a perfect demonstration that there is more than sufficient room for the whole spectrum, and that working together they can bring freshness and a new perspective to well-known music: Philippe Jaroussky - one of the newer tranche, sweet voiced, wonderfully agile, lively, operatic and engaging; and Andreas Scholl, whose extraordinary talent has towered over the genre, literally and figuratively, since he exploded onto the musical scene nearly two decades ago, and whose mastery of Baroque, Renaissance and, latterly, Mediæval music and particularly of sacred music remains unsurpassed to this day. Together with Ensemble Artaserse, they treated us to an evening of Henry Purcell - 5 solos each, 5 duets and some orchestral gems.
Andreas Scholl has recently returned to Purcell, whom he describes as his "first love", but has seldom performed (or recorded) in a dedicated recital. Yet in his ~36 years, Purcell provided modern-day countertenors with an almost unrivalled range of work, from sacred anthems, incidental songs and ceremonial Odes to the semi-operas such as King Arthur (1691) and The Fairy Queen (1692) which featured prominently in this concert. It was not at all clear, however, how they divided the spoils between them; several of the classics you long to hear AS sing were taken by PJ e.g. Fairest Isle and An Evening Hymn, yet this had the advantage of leaving One Charming Night, Music for a While and O Solitude to Andreas Scholl, which he delivered with all the heart-stopping clarity and expression for which is renowned. Naturally, Mr Scholl's much greater experience of English Renaissance music was evident, but Philippe Jaroussky's astonishingly high range, warmth and charm more than compensated for some occasional word-mangling which, in any case, would be understandable even in native-English speakers, given the complexity of Purcell's texts.