New York-based Andrew Blackmore-Dobbyn and San Francisco-based Carla Escoda debate the merits of the latest Russian star casting in La Bayadère.
CE: Olga Smirnova is a stunningly beautiful creature – and a fish out of water in Natalia Makarova’s staging of the 19th century classic La Bayadère for American Ballet Theatre at New York’s Metropolitan Opera House. Only 22, she has already performed the titular role of the Indian temple dancer in the Bolshoi’s production; it’s likely that the coaching she has received in that role perfectly suits the Grigorovich staging and the larger scale of the Bolshoi theatre.
From the moment she stepped on stage at the comparatively intimate Met, however, and Roman Zhurbin, in the role of the High Brahmin, plucked the veil off her face, she radiated far too much wattage. For a humble maiden whose main job is to schlep jugs of water to thirsty fakirs, she projected unexplained swells of emotion right out of the opera house onto Columbus Avenue.
Nikiya became a caricature as Smirnova exaggerated every twist of her wondrously pliant torso, every ripple of her silky arms. Her ravishing suppleness is a joy to behold, as is the way movement emanates from her back and undulates through to her fingertips, feet and head. But lack of restraint weakened the dramatic arc. Until the creepy Zhurbin put the moves on her, and her warrior lover showed up and things started to get complicated, it made no narrative sense to display all that fervor.
AB: Smirnova was emotionally extravagant in razor-sharp contrast to the charisma-challenged Hee Seo in the part of the imperious, scheming Princess Gamzatti. When Smirnova charged Seo with knife in hand, Seo did not seem especially concerned and the moment was lost despite Smirnova’s operatic flailing.
CE: In her sinuous dance-with-poisonous-snake-hidden-in-flower-basket, Smirnova gives us a portrayal of an absolutely crazed woman, rather than a naïve girl in despair over a betrayal. She stares out at the audience repeatedly to make sure we get it.
She is most effective in Act III, where she appears only to Muntagirov, a hallucinatory figment of his imagination that presages the imminent destruction of the temple – in which context her over-the-top emoting seems perfectly apropos.
AB: Raised in the Vaganova School and blessed with many of the gifts associated with great Russian ballerinas, she will probably be able to tone down the excesses of emotion but it will take time and coaching. Judging by the full house for this performance, she’ll be back many times and will have plenty of opportunity to work on blending in better.
Stylistic issues aside, Smirnova has what all too many American dancers lack, and that is the ability to move with complete authority and command of the stage. Smirnova is very much aware of the fact that she is there to be the star, and you never forget that as you watch her. This is what stars are made of. Hee Seo, to name one, doesn’t have it.
CE: Smirnova was blessed to have the noble and unfailingly attentive Vadim Muntagirov as a partner. He has the physique and authoritative presence of a warrior, and soared in his solos. When ordered to wed the Rajah’s beautiful, haughty daughter, he conveyed mixed emotions magnificently. Crushed and soulful in the Act II Shades scene, he knew that he had helped engineer Nikiya’s destruction. And when he wakes from his opium-induced hallucination, he turns frantic, grabbing at the attending soldiers as if pleading with them to tell him what in hell is going on. We feel his pain.