Crossing 9th Avenue to walk even further west, I deplored my lengthy commute from the A train. 'People live this far west?', I said to myself. I didn't realize I said the question out loud until my friend Emily replied, 'Sure, you can make any neighborhood hip in Manhattan.'
While some of us may criticize that hipster edge the arts bring to industrial neighborhoods, in this case it seemed fitting: I was on my way to see Kevin James and the [kāj] ensemble perform their new piece, 100 Waltzes for John Cage. And once inside the DiMenna Center, the bold colours on the concrete walls erased the dirt and grit from outside. Instantly, I was swept up in its contemporary, fresh feel.
Inspired by Cage's 49 Waltzes for the 5 Boroughs, Kevin James' 100 Waltzes for John Cage takes Cage's original work and catapults it into the digital age. Featuring nine iPad-equipped musicians, 100 waltzes, plus recorded audio from 147 New York City locations, James' piece also applies the same elements of controlled spontaneity.
James and the [kāj] ensemble - appropriately pronounced Cage - began with 147 specific New York City locations chosen using the classic Chines text I-Ching, also known as the Book of Changes. So with two random tosses of three coins, and the combined heads/tails permutations duly applied, precise GPS coordinates for all of the 147 New York City locations were derived.
To match the cacophony of recorded sounds, the musicians in the [kāj] ensemble performed segments of 100 waltzes, blending and overlapping with the very heartbeat of the city. Just like the recordings, the live performance was controlled by a predetermined, randomized process. Equipped with iPads, bar numbers, stanza numbers and number of bars were all randomly selected (I-Ching again!), as was the length of time each musician played each excerpt.
Sitting amongst found objects - vintage lamps and paper chinese lanterns - the musicians moved about the room throughout the performance, sometimes to sit in a different corner, other times to sit on the floor or in a chair amidst the audience. Even audience members engaged with the music by walking around the performance space, reading the programmes (which were scattered on music stands around the room) and sitting in various chairs in the middle of the room. For any outsiders, this performance may have looked more like a participatory art installation than a classical music concert.
Musically, the token triple meter of a waltz mixed with everyday city noises made for a unique, but oddly familiar aural experience. From the pastoral to the pedestrian, recorded noises included traffic and crowd noise, sirens and street music, bird songs, gentle lapping of water, even that incessant buzzing from the emergency door in the subway. But in the same way many New Yorkers grow accustomed to their rough urban soundscape, I found myself forgetting about the recordings, treating their familiar sounds as background noise rather than a central element of the performance.