Some Handel aficionados are not all that keen on attending yet another performance of Messiah, but some of us welcome them all, particularly performances of some of the Handel-sanctioned versions which are less often heard. This year the Halle Handel Festival included two different and rarely performed variants, one being the 1742 Dublin première, the other being the first London version of 1743. The first was performed in the Dom (Reform Cathedral), the second in the Marktkirche, both venues with significant Handel associations.
Standard common-or-garden Messiahs usually more or less replicate later London versions, from 1745 to 1750, when charity performances at the Foundling Hospital began. The 1742 and 1743 versions differ from the initial autograph version mainly based on Handel’s responses to the singers he had available, particularly Susannah Cibber in 1742 and Kitty Clive in 1743 in positive ways, and the reduction of the tenor and bass parts in 1742 due to singer deficiencies. For example, in 1742 the air “But who may abide” was reduced to a recitative. One of the delights of both versions is the 12/8 version of “Rejoice”, much more lyrical than the more triumphalist 4/4 version.
Messiah Fassung London 1743 was performed by Concerto Köln under the direction of Howard Arman, with the Bavarian Radio Symphony Choir. Rather than four or five soloists, the airs were sung by rotating members of the choir – five sopranos, seven altos, five tenors and four basses. This was presumably done in a spirit of collegial endeavour (or for some other reason – none of the previously announced singers appeared at all), but it did mean that the quality of the solos was variable. Some singers sounded like fully blown soloists, others sounded more like members of the choir. One did wonder if, for all of their sweetness, some of the sopranos were audible down the back of the church. The choir per se was remarkable for its clear English diction, and this applied to most, if not quite all, the soloists.
The work opened with a sonorous if slow-ish rendition of the Sinfony. The actual sound of the choir, as distinct from its diction, was a little indistinct at times, but generally displayed good discipline and also commitment, as did all the soloists. The orchestra played very well indeed, with some quite speedy tempi after the overture. Arman conducted with great intensity and attention to detail, obviously having a good grasp of the overall architecture of the work, and maintaining momentum throughout. This was particularly important as it was perfomed without a signicant interval, just short tuning pauses between the parts.