Listening to music with your eyes: it is possible with Stephen Malinowski’s Music Animation Machine (MAM). This device shows the pitch, timing and duration of notes through symbols on a screen. Violinist Etienne Abelin used the machine and other ways of presentation to bring classical music closer to the audience of The Royal Concertgebouw. But does it work?
The auditorium is completely dark. Then suddenly the first notes of Bach’s Dolce from his Second sonata in A, BWV1015 sound. Nothing can be seen, not even the musicians, who cannot see their sheet music. The darkness makes the music piercing. When the musicians continue with the Andante, the lights come on, and the projection screen is enlightened. As Etienne Abelin and pianist Tamar Halperin play, the MAM shows the bass line on the screen in a steady pattern of dots. Above that, the two voices appear that together make this piece. The music becomes visible; even more in the subsequent Arabesque no. 1 (Debussy), performed with lovely variety in tempo and dynamics by Halperin. Through the different colours of symbolic patterns and the height of the symbols, one can clearly distinguish between the three, sometimes four different voices within the piano part. What an advanced device this MAM is.
But there is a disadvantage to this skilled machine. The idea is that music can be fathomed better with visuals. But the risk of the MAM is that one focuses completely on the colourful symbols on the screen without paying attention to the interpretation and performance of the music. Therefore it is good to have a bit of alternation between music with visuals and without visuals. Cellist Anita Leuzinger, for example, starts playing Bach’s Prelude from his Cello Suite no. 1 in G major, BWV1007 accompanied by pretty visuals. But there are no visuals with the Allemande and the Courante. Instead, one can enjoy Leuzinger completely lose herself in the music with her eyes closed.