“I’ve been listening to Moses und Aron in the car,” a friend said to me after the dress rehearsal, “but it doesn’t exactly give you much to hum along to.” Even so, my friend was there at the first night, along with a full house at the Wales Millennium Centre. Despite her shocked references to “scenes of Sodom and Gomorrah” in the second act, there turned out to be scant Sodom, no Gomorrah, and precious little in terms of magical stage spectacle – no burning bush, no serpent, no golden calf, no pillar of flame. None of this mattered: the performance was riveting from beginning to end.
The set for both acts was a panelled courtroom or lecture theatre, complete with raked seating, a bench for the absent judges, and a projector. Bright light pouring in through the rear window symbolised the burning bush, in front of which a shambling, inarticulate Moses stumbled about waiting for God’s voice to make itself clear. John Tomlinson played Moses in a way that resembled the older Brahms – the man, not the music – with a prophet’s grey beard and a clerical suit, rather the worse for wear. Aron was not the advertised Rainer Trost, who was indisposed, but the sensational tenor Mark Le Brocq, who stood in at short notice on minimal rehearsal, but who gave a performance that was just as gripping as Tomlinson’s, with a vocal line that, by contrast with Moses’ stammering Sprechstimme, sounded almost like bel canto.
The opera is a theological argument, conducted often in abstract terms (clearly rendered in the indispensible surtitles by Sophie Rashbrook and Jacqueline Pischorn) debating the place of God’s law in the life of mankind, and how this is to be communicated to the people, whose spiritual well-being depends not only on obeying this law but understanding it in the first place. Central to the debate is the chorus, broken up both musically and theologically into factions as fiercely divided as those in Israel today. There are the elders who are frightened for their safety because Moses has killed an Egyptian guard. A young couple debate on Moses’ being chosen to lead the Israelites. The notion of one god being stronger than the Egyptians’ huge pantheon is put up for discussion. Meanwhile, Aron becomes angry at Moses’ inarticulacy, and begins his string of miracles. In this production, both the serpent and Moses’ hand (which Aron turns leprous and cures again) are represented by a bible, and it is the same bible that stands in for the tablets of stone. Nonetheless, Le Brocq’s long-haired, broad-shouldered Aron is a snake-oil salesman who uses visual trickery rather than verbal dexterity to win the Israelites over.
The chorus were in what looked like their street clothes (no costume designer is credited) and had to make the most of their musical lines in order to stand out as individuals. The smaller roles were well cast, with Richard Wiegold as a portly, gruff-voiced priest of the old order. The first act ended with a visible sleight-of-hand worthy of Doctor Dulcamara in The Elixir of Love: Aron pours red dye into a glass of water, prophesying that the Nile will turn to blood. The people accept his promise of a land flowing with milk and honey.