The Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment (OAE) is nothing if not innovative: there’s The Night Shift, a late-night concert series, and Purcell in a Pub, and now there’s The Works, a fun and informal way to learn more about a classical masterpiece in which the work is deconstructed and analysed before a full performance.
In this, the first of the series, Mozart’s Piano Concerto No. 23 came under the spotlight, and our guide for the evening was the charismatic and renowned Mozart scholar and pianist, Robert Levin.
The members of the OAE play genuine, or fine replicas of, period instruments, whose sounds, as Levin said, can “stimulate the imagination”, and offer us a suggestion of how Mozart’s music may have sounded to him. The piano on which Levin performed was a replica Walther, a copy of an instrument Mozart himself would have played.
Levin is an engaging, insightful and entertaining speaker, as well as a fine pianist, and while one may not always agree with what he has to say (and there were a few dissenters in the audience, those who may have been expecting a more traditional concert format), one cannot help but be swept along by his sheer delight in and enthusiasm for his subject.
Levin offered us a view across Mozart’s writing desk, a snapshot of his creative life in 1783 or 1784, when he first began work on the Piano Concerto No. 23. To give us a taste of Mozart’s compositional process, Levin took us back to basics, to the materials Mozart would have used to compose: his paper, his quill pens and his ink. From these clues, Levin concludes that Mozart was “a short order chef”, a composer who wrote what was most likely to bring in income at the time. It is a mark of his genius that he was able to turn his attention to a multitude of works at any one time, and that he could sketch out a work, set it aside, and then return to it at a later date. This is evidenced, claims Levin, by the different papers, inks and pen strokes, and when Mozart returned to the concerto in 1786, there was sufficient framework in place on which he could hang the rest of the work.
Levin also suggests that when Mozart returned to the work in 1786 he may have had a performer other than himself in mind, a fact indicated by a fully written out cadenza, and an embellished second movement. Levin, with the OAE, demonstrated this by playing the earlier 'draft version' of the first movement, and the unadorned second movement. This had a tragic spareness, yet the fleshed-out version was even more heartbreaking, showing the full expressive range of the instrument for which Mozart was writing.