The inter-war years produced some of the most dynamic and popular choral works that have been composed since the 18th century. Tonight’s London Philharmonic Orchestra concert, conducted by Hans Graf, combined two very different results of this flowering. Both masterpieces in their own way, they unexpectedly complemented each other and made for an entertaining concert.
The Stravinsky Symphony of Psalms was composed in 1930 when the composer was at the imaginative height of his neoclassical period. With this work and works such as Oedipus Rex and the Symphonies of Wind Instruments, he found an austerity that transcended the more light-hearted aspects of neoclassicism. These pieces find a very deep vein of profundity and beauty that links them to his important earlier Russian works such as The Rite of Spring and Les Noces and as such must rank as one of his greatest and enduring works.
In the Symphony of Psalms, the orchestral scoring is particularly telling. Omitting the upper strings and the clarinets gives the sound of the piece an edge, with reedy woodwind and brass dominating. Much of the choral writing has a chant-like quality, with less emphasis on polyphony and more on blocks of harmony. This is music of restraint and dignity and the LPO forces under the baton of a conductor new to me, Hans Graf, found the right level of intensity through some measured tempi and precision playing, particularly from the woodwinds. At times, a problem of balance seemed to occur, with the choir seeming not to come through the textures with enough bite. But this may have been more about Stravinsky’s pungent orchestration than any fault in the performance.
Carl Orff’s music has been virtually ignored outside Germany, apart from the fact that Carmina Burana is quite possibly the most popular choral work in the repertoire. It remains quite odd that one of the most obnoxious men in musical history should have written one of the most irresistible works ever composed. Orff was a tricky man whose eagerness for success led him into some very deep waters, both politically and personally. Carmina Burana was one of the favorite works of the Nazi regime and it was very clear that he relished the fame and fortune that this gave him. After the war, he was happy to implicate and blame friends and colleagues to justify his actions during these dark years. The fact that Carmina Burana has more than survived these taints is evidence of its quality and popular appeal.