At first I was a little baffled by the choice of programme. Usually there is something obvious linking the pieces together. A common theme or thread, notions of an era or similarities of form. Granted, Mozart and Hummel will often sit beside each other in the latter of these respects, but the addition of Shostakovich’s Concerto for Piano, Trumpet and Strings seemed more of an acknowledgement of the paucity in repertoire that combines the three, than any neat or logical fit. Therefore, I can proffer no explanation why the programme worked so well, other than the artistic chemistry between the performers.
Arguably the sheer versatility of the Zurich Chamber Orchestra also played a part. The fine acoustics of Birmingham’s historic Town Hall obviously suited them, for they greatly impressed me with the first three movements of Mozart’s Symphony no. 33 in B flat major, K319. They understood the themes with their delicately balanced forms, elegant expositions, and developments. The symphony is full of humour and in this regard the orchestra, under Concertmaster Willi Zimmermann, exploited every nuance of playfulness. The interplay between string and woodwind was exact and the whole symphony was played with a refined approach. There was unity in the playing and no section vied for prominence to the detriment of any other. They nailed the first three movements.
Stark contrast in the fourth movement and, alas, I was left wanting. While I understand that early Mozart is often safe and secure, his last three symphonies written in Salzburg afford us a glimpse of the embryonic passion that he would later reveal in his “Jupiter” Symphony, and demonstrate why he came to feel so stifled by his home town. For me this was an opportunity for the Zurich Chamber Orchestra to push the boundaries a little, to liberate themselves from the civilised restraint of the preceding movements. Not too much, just a bit louder and crisper on a sforzando here and there, a tad more frenetic on the violin’s faster ornamentations, and some slightly more audible horns. It was an opportunity the orchestra chose not to take. While the playing was wonderfully tight, it didn’t reach its adventurous potential.
Mozart's Piano Concerto no. 14 in E flat major, K449, in the second half of the programme, contained greater variety and contrast and had all the beautifully phrased form and poise of the symphony without lacking that final oomph. This was thanks to the outstanding performance and leadership of pianist Gabriela Montero. When Mozart wrote this concerto, he had matured in style, having been liberated from the creative shackles of Salzburg for five years. Therefore, part of the dynamic contrast is in the music itself rather than just the performance. Nonetheless, Montero magically animated this greater breadth of emotion, from simple fun to complex gravitas, accentuating both jovial and profound. Throughout the several changes of mood there was never any confusion in Montero’s interpretation or purpose.