The prospect of writing about one of the world’s greatest orchestras, conducted by one of the world’s greatest conductors, playing one of the world’s most revolutionary pieces of music left me excited, if not a little daunted. So much ink has been spilled over Stravinsky’s Rite of Spring since its riotous première 99 years ago that commenting on this seminal work, interpreted by the London Symphony Orchestra under Valery Gergiev, seemed no mean feat. Little did I know that I’d struggle far more with Stravinsky’s opera-oratorio Oedipus Rex, composed 14 years later in an idiosyncratic mish-mash of neoclassical styles. Fortunately, the performers didn’t seem to share my apprehension or difficulties; and their performance indicated that they did share my excitement.
Upon hearing the instantly recognisable opening of The Rite of Spring, its extraordinary nature is revealed in all its bizarre glory. Principal bassoonist Rachel Gough’s opening solo certainly augured an exceptional performance. Gough took her time and articulated this phrase – which carries the weight of having changed musical history for ever – absolutely exquisitely, retaining a levity befitting its evocation of spring despite its stratospheric pitch. This musical freshness spread like the rising sun’s rays across the wind section, whose vibrato-less, reedy voices Stravinsky favoured for their inhumanness. This instrumental decision was revolutionary, as was the opening’s bitonal harmonic scheme, which superimposes similar melodies a semitone apart. The same technique produces at times crushing, crashing passages that leave the listener squirming (but simultaneously rejoicing wildly) in genuine physical discomfort; at times mystical lyrical passages based on folk tunes that conjure up a mysterious soundworld of the primitive Russian landscapes of the ballet’s scenario.
Of course, this concert performance was without the dancers, costumes, choreography and set design so central to the original Ballets Russes production; certainly, with two-thirds of the Gesamtkunstwerk missing, it is a different beast altogether. However, Gergiev’s interpretation really emphasised the work’s remarkable heterophonous textures, in which the same folksongs – slightly altered – are layered and layered again. The rhythmic and harmonic complexities that emerge are what endows The Rite with its visceral power and immense tension; Gergiev managed to exploit these, even conducting as he did with a toothpick.
However, I did feel that in some of the more riotous sections, the orchestra’s energy was slightly underwhelming, and that the maestro could have unleashed a little more anarchic wildness to contrast with the exquisitely intense long sections of stasis. It was an interpretation that distanced itself somewhat from the happenings of that crazy night in 1913, and posed the question: do we perhaps mix up the music with its reception? Do we lose The Rite in the riot?