When Bruckner died in 1896 he had done much work on his Ninth Symphony and the finale was almost complete. Unfortunately the executors failed to secure Bruckner's rooms, nor did they ensure that the finale manuscripts were delivered to the Imperial Library. So many pages are missing, and those that do exist are in many locations world-wide. Very roughly speaking, two thirds of the finale exist in five fragments, with many sketches and discarded manuscript papers which help indicate what should fill the gaps. Various scholars have made attempts to produce a completed performing version, so that we can at least hear the music Bruckner worked so hard to compose during his final years.
With a week there were two performances of Bruckner’s Ninth with the Finale in the completed performing version by the editorial team, Samale, Phillips, Cohrs and Mazzuca (SPCM) in its latest revision - one performance in Eindhoven with the Brabant SO conducted by Friedemann Layer on 16 October, and this performance. Both performances were greeted with great enthusiasm and standing ovations. The symphony as a four movement work is slowly but surely moving into the accepted repertoire, and more audiences are becoming acquainted with a symphony now with the proportions which Bruckner had always intended.
This performance was by a very young orchestra and it was a one-off project, not something fashioned and perfected over a long tour, but the work of merely a few days. So the focus of the evening was upon this youth orchestra event, perhaps rather more than on the German première of a version of a four movement Ninth. Rattle said backstage after the concert, of the symphony as a four movement work, ‘It’s a monster!’. Extraordinarily, those that sought to bring this monster to life were youngsters, merely 16 - 19 years old. Their achievement over the few days’ rehearsal (that included a workshop conducted by Dr Benjamin-Gunnar Cohrs, elucidating many issues with respect to the sources and the completion) was magnificent. So it really was their concert.
But this was a German première, and for the first time this finale was being conducted by a first rank conductor of one of the most famous orchestras in the world, and as such represents a significant step towards bringing the four-movement Ninth into the received canon. Rattle, after the concert, self-deprecatingly requested understanding that this was his first attempt at the work, the implication being that there are still many problems to solve. As such it can be seen as a dry run for his forthcoming performances of the work with the Berliner Philharmoniker in February 2012. There was an enormous string section, 20 first violins, 18 seconds etc., presumably to provide as much opportunity as possible for would-be orchestral players, and they produced a glorious sound. But it has to be said that the woodwind and brass - who might have benefited from judicious doubling - were often unable to make themselves well-heard over the strings. Rattle at times had clarinets and oboes raise their bells high, a Mahler-ish gesture, but even so they were often difficult to hear at all. In the tuttis the brass often seemed subject to too great a restraint.
With such limitations it becomes difficult to disentangle interpretation from expediency, and the attempt might in the end be irrelevant to the main thrust of the event. There was a tendency for Rattle to encourage very expressive playing in string passages, like the second subject groups of the first and third movements. In fact the first movement Gesangsperiode [song period] was played with an intense passion of Mahlerian extremity, and in the Adagio, after a nicely played Wagner tuba chorale, Bruckner’s ‘Farewell to Life’, the second theme was delivered with ravishing beauty. But it was hard to feel that either moment was part of a cogent whole, that the expressive power they were generating was harnessed to the overall logic of the symphony. The Scherzo was strongly presented - more from the brass would have made it even better, but the Trio was really rather heavy, perhaps due to the large string section, - and didn’t register such a dramatic contrast as it should. The 1st oboe solos in both the Scherzo and Adagio were played with great understanding and beauty that went straight to the heart.