Programming a single-composer concert can be treacherous. The musical equivalent of having three servings of triple chocolate cake, the third helping never quite seems as good as the first. Happily, any concerns about the Cleveland Orchestra’s all-Prokofiev program this week proved entirely unfounded. Although the three works were all identifiably Prokofiev, there was considerable contrast between the three works, and guest conductor Stéphane Denève was impressive in illuminating significant aspects of the composer’s career.
The Love for Three Oranges was composed in 1919 on the promise of a production by the Chicago Grand Opera. The première did not take place until 1921, with the composer conducting. An orchestral suite followed soon after. The plot concerns a group of commedia dell’arte characters who intervene in a story about a King whose ill son can only be cured with laughter. The orchestral suite is full of sassy humor, clever orchestrations, and character pieces that illuminate the story. The rat-a-tat-tat rhythms of the first movement “Ridiculous People” seem like shrieking hyenas, with an ambling march. “Infernal Scenes” feature crescendos and diminuendos paired with ascending and descending scales, building to a sudden fortissimo climax. The “March” is the best known movement from the suite, with its jaunty tune. “The Prince and the Princess” featured a prominent viola solo, sensitively played by the orchestra’s newly appointed principal, Wesley Collins. The final movement, “The Escape” was a scene of swirling virtuosity. Denève made the most of the many contrasted passages in the suite, with textural detail.
Canadian violinist James Ehnes is not a show-off performer. His performance of Prokofiev’s Violin Concerto no. 1 in D major was a model of refinement, precision and understated brilliance. Ehnes’ sound is slender, but many passages in the concerto are very lightly scored, assuring the prominence of the soloist. The concerto is largely lyrical, playing to Ehnes’ strengths, but with abundant technical difficulties along the way, which he handled with aplomb. The second movement scherzo was a perpetual motion for the solo violin, with a brief march of the most complicated sort. A return to the opening music closes the movement abruptly, almost like a musical question mark. The third movement had a flowing solo melody, with very high passages entirely of trills. The concerto ends quietly in radiant D major, a beautiful conclusion. Denève was a sympathetic accompanist throughout. At the end, he maintained the audience’s rapt silence for several long seconds before he broke the mood.