In a season when all the buzz was about Shostakovich’s The Nose, and all the banners and billboards were advertising Carmen and La traviata, another rarity mounted by Opera Australia rather slipped under the radar. Massenet’s “heroic comedy” Don Quichotte is by no stretch of the imagination a repertory standard – this run marked its Sydney première – but it is a grateful vehicle for a bass with decent acting chops. In this production, the title role was played by the seasoned star Ferruccio Furlanetto. Sadly, he was indisposed on opening night, but returned for the second performance, fortuitously the one under review.
Carving a workable drama out of Cervantes’ Don Quixote is no easy task. Massenet’s librettist, Henri Cain, worked from a play adapted from the beloved novel, and the opera plot centres on Quixote’s quest to retrieve jewels stolen by brigands and thus win the hand of Dulcinée. The latter is only a figure of Quixote’s imagination in the original, representing ideal womanhood and virtue, but here she is turned into what the New Grove Dictionary of Opera calls “a capricious small-town tart”. Accompanied everywhere by four forgettable suitors, she straddles the line between playing up to the knight errant’s delusions and being honestly charmed by him. On his successful return, she gently but firmly rejects his marriage proposal and, broken-hearted, he dies.
Another major challenge is how to capture the humour of the original, which rides on the difference between the mad knight’s flights of fancy and the sober realities he misreads as part of his dreams. The most successful instance of this was in the famous windmill-tilting scene in Act 2. Initially, two glowing red specks were all that could be seen in the gloom, which Quichotte assumed were giants. As the light gradually came up, the model windmills became visible, while more images were projected onto the front scrim, a visual representation of the confusing whirl of thoughts in Quichotte’s mind. Furlanetto charged off stage on his model horse, and the act ended with the sight of his dummy double caught on the rotating blade.
The production team seemed to have expended most of their creative energies on this act, as the rest of the staging was rather drab and often poorly lit. The opera has inherent problems with its pacing and continuity, and sadly the lacklustre direction failed to remedy them. Even the opening scene of revelry felt formulaic, and the static, tableau-like handling of the chorus compared unfavourably to the lively business they were given in Moshinsky’s Traviata. The start of Act 4, a bridging scene for Dulcinée and her hangers-on, was a particular low point, rife with stale orientalisms and paper-thin characters.