Yevgeny Sudbin’s recital was an intriguing example of the building of a mixed programme, bookended by elusive Russian late Romantics, and with Tchaikovsky salon pieces, Scarlatti sonatas and a supreme Liszt masterpiece in between. On paper it looked slightly random, but it worked. We began with Scriabin’s Vers la flamme, in which the “flame” is that “ocean of fire” which purges the universe and then renews our existence. Sudbin wrote his own programme note which began: “Oh, how easy it is to become possessed by Scriabin… Once one is bitten and the venom, in the form of his sound world, enters the body and soul, the effects become all-encompassing, even life-threatening!” Certainly Vers la flamme is the work of a man possessed, and drives inexorably onwards in a continuous ascending line, to which Sudbin brought a purgatory fire of his own with the sequence of tremolos flickering with a burning intensity. As that programme note suggests, his identification with the composer is remarkable.
After that opening blaze, there followed a spell in calmer waters. Tchaikovsky makes relatively few appearances in piano recital programmes, except perhaps those given by Russian pianists. But his great asset, sheer charm, was heard in each piece of this group. Especially beguiling was the early Nocturne in F major, written in Nice, at a time when Tchaikovsky also wrote: “Old age has come, when nothing pleases me any more” (the composer was thirty-one). That melancholy informs the melody of his nocturne, and Sudbin’s phrasing respected its simplicity and directness. With the Barcarolle from The Seasons we were on more familiar ground, but Sudbin made it sound fresh and not all hackneyed. His response to these short numbers was on just the right scale, expressive but with no more rubato than they can bear.
Of Liszt’s formidable set of twelve Transcendental Studies, one of the highlights is no.11, Harmonies du Soir, which is quite often played on its own. Those sumptuous “evening harmonies” and bell sounds are harbingers of Debussy, and the piece is partly a study in pedalling. There was plenty of impressionistic subtlety in Sudbin’s account, which also set the rafters ringing in the louder passages, the harsh clangour of the Steinway’s upper range an intrusion upon the essentially crepuscular mood. In fact, that treble hardness above forte was slighlty troubling at other moments too – Liszt often needs poise as well as power. But overall this truly transcendental playing made a stirring curtain to the first half, and it was rapturously received.