Who would have known that an ordinary phone call to Pedro Machado, co-artistic director of Candoco Dance Co., would lead to a very stimulating cultural discussion on legacies, embodied knowledge and how they link to Candoco's methodology and repertoire? Machado is clearly a passionate artist with an earnest commitment to not only the company but also to inclusive dance and dare I say, to an inclusive society.
We began the conversation with a brief history of the company; Candoco was founded in 1991 by Celeste Dandeker and Adam Benjamin. It is a company comprised of disabled and non-disabled dancers. As their website explains, the company embraces Celeste's “immersion environment where all can contribute and give something of themselves, allowing for a sense of ownership where the nature of the group, whether vulnerable or different are included.” Machado explained that he danced with the company for 10 years and knew Celeste quite well; he felt that he understood her vision and the legacy, which is obviously why he shares the co-artistic director role with Stine Nilsen.
What exactly is that legacy and how does Celeste's vision live on today? Machado was very clear about the fact that the company works in a democratic fashion where all roles, bodies and perspectives are valued and included. Their ability to have a “shared vision” off stage is clearly emulated on stage and, because of this, they are exciting to watch; Candoco not only displays those different bodies onstage but it allows them to take centre stage and be in the spotlight. The infrastructure and approach of the company provide a model we could all learn from. One my favorite lines from Machado was “We can't use the same yardstick to measure every body.” How powerful and true. His words forced me to contemplate what our world could be if we all existed without being compared to others. What if we could applaud our differences and harvest co-existence? What would that world look like?
The natural progression of the conversation led me to reference Candoco's Triple Bill at the Warwick Arts Centre. I described how powerful and unsettling I thought Thomas Hauert's Notturnino was as a performance piece, but also as a model for something much bigger that is not necessarily dance related. He replied, “very astute observations Rosamaria,” and went on to say: “if we could do it again, I might have changed the order of the Triple Bill. I might have opened with a different piece and perhaps prepared the audience.” This reflective comment echoes the ruminative nature of the company.