Boris Godunov is a historical tragedy with many facets, so there are many angles from which to view it and many aspects on which on can focus. At La Scala’s season opener last night, the musical focus was on the antagonism between two great bass voices: Ildar Abdrazakov as Boris and Ain Anger as his nemesis Pimen, the softly spoken monk who sows the seeds of the tsar’s descent into madness.
Although Russian himself, Abdrazakov isn’t the typical gravelly bass that we associate with the title role. Instead, he carried the role with exquisite musicianship; the voice was rich and melodious in every part of the range, his enunciation was crystal clear and there was intense expressivity in every phrase, whether regal pomp, familial love, remorse or increasingly manic terror. In contrast, Anger (who is Estonian, not Russian) has exactly the sepulchral darkness we expect of Russian bass singing. He exuded quiet authority – the word “quiet” is deceptive, because he was certainly not singing softly throughout – and persuasively incarnated the relentless march of history.
The style of Pushkin’s poem was inspired by Shakespeare’s history plays and that’s the aspect on which Kaspar Holten’s staging focuses. Pimen is on stage from the beginning and we see his history being written continuously as the action progress, on beautifully crafted giant video projections by Luke Halls, all in the context of even larger maps of 16th-century Russia and its surroundings. Holten’s other focus is on the murdered Tsarevich Dmitri (in this telling, at least, the murder was ordered by Boris), whose bloodied ghost is present throughout the opera, distracting and disturbing Boris at every moment.
Sets and lighting (Es Devlin and Jonas Bøgh) are attractive, with the occasional wow moment such as the dazzling light which envelops the royal family’s appearance at the coronation. Ida Marie Ellekilde steers clear of standard costume drama, preferring a conflation of modern and folkloric dress, sometimes ordinary, sometimes opulent. Broadly, the staging is effective and fairly safe. For once in their lives, the loggionisti failed to find anything to boo. If anyone expected political points to be made or parallels to be drawn between Russian autocracy of the 16th century and Putin’s Russia of today, they will have been disappointed; Holten is far more interested in Boris’s personal tragedy, which was lit up by Abdrazakov’s commanding performance.