Purcell’s “King Arthur” premiered to great acclaim in London in 1691.Then, opera’s principal characters did not sing, except if they were supernatural, pastoral or somewhat tipsy. Instead, the protagonists are actors, and much of King Arthur is simply spoken text which here, in Herbert Fritsch’s new production in Zürich, was delivered in German only. Sabrina Zwach’s translation of the libretto included clever plays-on-words, and allusions to 20th-century events and sexual politics, boosting the comic content considerably. The songs, however, were sung in English, injecting Dryden’s eloquence and poetry like sparkling gems of wisdom throughout. Under the musical direction of Laurence Cummings, the accomplished Orchestra La Scintilla performed its usual magic. In short, the Baroque configuration brought out the very best of the “scintillating” in Purcell, the sensation that nicely underscores its own name.
The tale itself revolves around Arthur's attempts to recover his fiancée, the blind Cornish Princess Emmeline, who has been abducted by his enemy, the Saxon King Oswald of Kent. King Arthur's Britons battle the Saxons in a spectacle that features supernatural characters: magicians Merlin and Osmond, the deities Cupid and Venus and a whole host of sprites. Among actors, Arthur (Wolfram Koch), his Emmeline (Ruth Rosenfeld), and her hilarious maid Mathilda (Carol Schuler) were stellar in their roles. The Saxon magician Osmond (Annika Meier) was so exaggeratedly calculating and comic, so real and unreal, that just to experience her was worth the price of admission.
As a noble symbol for “Britishness”, King Arthur and his legend have inspired countless poems and plays, Hollywood films and television documentaries, all of which bridge the gap between reality and illusion. In Zurich, director and set designer Fritsch pulled out all the stops to shake-up, amuse and bemuse within that framework. Here is the “juice that makes the Britons bold” the chorus in Act I sings, but what in the story is real? What is unreal? Does Merlin’s intervention alone ensure King Arthur’s victory? Does his beloved Emmeline regain her eyesight by virtue of some superhuman power? Whichever side you come down on, the action here was almost consistently tumultuous, and its frequent slapstick and Monty Python-like antics were not to everyone’s liking. Over one particularly chaotic scene, someone bellowed from the second balcony: “but with a little class!” Fair enough an objection, but given that tumult on the stage was not uncommon in Purcell and Dryden’s time, should we argue for historical accuracy? I think not.