Great operas are made by great marriages between composer and librettist – be they enduring (Mozart and da Ponte, Strauss and Hofmannsthal) or fleeting. Of the contemporary operas I’ve been privileged to see, there’s one that strikes me as being far ahead of the rest in achieving that perfect combination of a great story with well crafted words, set brilliantly to music: Flight. So I was delighted to get the chance to speak to composer Jonathan Dove and librettist April De Angelis – by three-way video call, with us all housebound – to prompt them to reminisce about the creation of one of the most successful operas of recent decades.
The first thing that strikes one about Flight is that it’s extremely funny. The gags – which flow in an unending stream – are light, hilarious and beautifully set up. Dove had wanted to write a comedy from the moment in 1995 that Glyndebourne’s Anthony Whitworth-Jones asked him if he would like to write an opera for them – “which is a question people would kill to be asked – I didn’t even pretend to hesitate”. He had in mind “a Figaro for the 90s – of course, it’s impossible, but who wouldn’t want that” and he knew immediately that he wanted to work with De Angelis, with whom he had previously collaborated on Pig, a ten minute chamber opera. “The first time we met, April made me laugh straightaway,” Dove remembers. “She also impressed me enormously with some very incisive remarks on an opera I’d seen recently that I thought hadn’t worked”.
When it comes to humour, I ask about what does work. It becomes clear that De Angelis hasn’t lost her ability to present a clear analysis. “What’s funny about people is the discrepancy between how they imagine they’re being seen and what is really coming across. So that’s all you’re doing, really: there’s a comic gap between what someone intends to happen and how it’s actually being received by other people and the audience. You can’t impose a gag on a character, so you think ‘well, they’re in this scene, what’s their take on it? How are they misreading themselves and everyone else?'” Dove interposes that “a good way of killing a joke is often to set it to music,” to which De Angelis counters that “if you have a kind of culturally high registered music like you have in opera and then you have something that’s set against that, something crude or banal, there’s humour in that.” It would appear that the words “we have our lucky donkey for luck” are just intrinsically funny when you sing them in an operatic voice.
De Angelis has written many plays and few operas. Much of the craft is similar, she feels – the construction of the story, the structure of a scene, creating interesting characters. The most important difference is in the process of writing words that will somehow lend themselves to being sung. There is a quality of heightened language, of spareness as well as the fact that some phrases will be sung repeatedly. She points to a phrase like “soon our journeys will start” that is sung many times by different characters, with a subtly different meaning for each.
For her, character and dialogue are the easy part: what’s really hard is the plot. The story behind Flight is an exceptional one: that of Mehran Karimi Nasseri, the Iranian refugee who had been living in Terminal 1 of Charles de Gaulle Airport since 1988 (he was not to leave until 2006, long after the opera’s premiere and the 2004 release of Steven Spielberg’s film The Terminal). De Angelis and Dove had been kicking many possible stories around unsuccessfully and she had been running out of time and ideas when a friend mentioned Nasseri’s story to her the day before a crucial meeting. It was a great relief when Dove “just leapt on the idea” and “recognised that it had legs”.
“Everything about it felt fresh,” he recalls. “Nixon in China and The Ice Break had isolated airport scenes, but there had not been a complete opera that was set in an airport. There’s the essential idea of somebody who’s trapped because he’s not allowed into the country, but he’s not sent home. There’s an unexpected act of bureaucratic mercy, but only qualified, only up to a point. And there seemed to be such a mythic power to this person trapped between worlds.”
There was never any intention to tell Nasseri’s story from beginning to end and the plot of Flight seems to have grown organically: the two “found the story as they went along” with a great deal of trial and error. None the less, the opera has a substantial level of formal structure: the group of disparate people trapped together is a trope familiar to us from Agatha Christie to Buñuel's The Exterminating Angel; the big tarantella finale of Act 1 is well-used in opera and musical theatre. Dove considers it a nod to Rossini but also points out a basic practicality about the similarly lively Act 2 finale: “We were writing it for Glyndebourne, where there is a long dinner interval, so that must have been in the back of our minds, at least, about needing a good finale before the interval.” Flight has echoes of other operas of the past, notably of Falstaff being stuffed into a laundry basket.