There’s an ease with which Can Çakmur communicates that’s rarely found in performers so young. It’s immediately apparent when you hear his playing, but it’s unmissable verbally too – he could easily compere concerts, or present lectures on his projects. We speak breezily on subjects from future marathon ambitions to the work of Theodor Adorno and the perils of wild mushroom foraging.
The pianist shot to fame as a 20-year-old, winning the Scottish International Piano Competition in 2017. He went one better a year later, winning the Hamamatsu International Piano Competition, a prize which promised a lasting relationship as well as global plaudits. Çakmur puts a lot down to that support. “Without Hamamatsu, there would have been no career, there would have been no recordings, and there would have been very few concerts,” A return to Japan is on the cards once something approaching normality resumes.
Born in Ankara to a musical family, the Turkish pianist gained a scholarship to travel north to Germany to further his education in 2015. Moving to Germany, and Weimar in particular, meant Çakmur found himself in the cradle of a strong Liszt tradition. Being the city where the virtuoso spent the most prolific compositional period of his life, the influence is there for all to see, in the Liszt House, the Liszt Foundation and the Hochschule für Musik Franz Liszt, where Çakmur now studies. It’s a tradition Çakmur has immersed himself in as a performer; the final of the Hamamatsu Prize saw him tackle the Piano Concerto, switching tack for an impressive recording of the Liszt / Schubert Schwanengesang released late last year.
That tradition is one he wears proudly, but there’s more to Liszt than the flurries of notes and the infamous showmanship, as he explains. “If I could choose to meet one person from music history, it would be Liszt. Yes, he's this genius that we all know, but just to see how he was as a person, both in his attitude towards students and generosity and openness to ideas, but also as an idealist, and somebody who maybe had a vision where art may be heading to beyond his death.”
The Liszt / Schubert project was a striking disc with a charming conception. The memory of discovering Schubert as a child is a vivid one for Çakmur. “I must have been 14. One day I was doing homework and, in the background, there was some Schubert playing. It was the second movement of the G major sonata, the big one. I found it so wicked! I had to listen to the whole thing.” Through Schubert, a life-long love affair with Lieder quickly developed, attached to a single singer. “I asked my father if he had any Schubert song recordings and he happened to have the [Dietrich] Fischer-Dieskau versions – I didn't know who the singer was at that point. Basically, I was crazy about him. Throughout high school I listened only to his recordings and nothing else.” Did he try and emulate Fischer-Dieskau vocally? “No,” Çakmur replies quickly. “I have a horrible voice – you don't want that!”
Knowing as much about the context as possible is a route into finding authenticity in a sound – a historically informed performance which only occasionally brings a switch in instruments. “I try to grasp it as a language,” says Çakmur on parachuting into new eras with every turn. “You not only play what's there, but ideally you're completely comfortable in the style, so you can move in and out freely as you like. This is for Mozart as well as Stravinsky.”
Future projects see Çakmur move away from the core classical repertoire, curating a geographically-based programme that starts with Béla Bartók and takes in the music of George Enescu, as well as two less well-known voices – the Greek composer Dimitri Mitropoulos and Ahmet Adnan Saygun, a member of the ‘Turkish Five’. Despite the warring styles and clashing nationalities, the disc aims for “a peaceful atmosphere beyond all these nationalistic tendencies where the music is something similar between all these regions – I’m trying to find a common point as well as differences.”
The scale of the preparation that goes into Çakmur’s music is impressive. But many could learn from the unfussy way it all comes together. “Old recordings are good to see how little they care about written text, but in a good way – they definitely knew what they were doing. Our approach to the score is so narrow minded, so we see quarter notes and we think they're definitely quarter notes.” What about choosing editions? “I'm very unpicky, and if it's a complete mess I'll just make corrections. If there are slight differences, actually I welcome that – people hear always from the same editions. Say if you're playing some Chopin pieces and if you find a Breitkopf from the 1850s, there are slight differences, which I find very charming. That's all part of being in the language."