This production of Rossini's Otello could count on a vocal cast of stratospheric quality, despite the fact that director Amos Gitai’s initial claim to depict the drama as the story of a migrant, just like modern refugees, was a fatuous suggestion. And it proved useless, as it had no further development during the rest of the performance, as if Gitai didn't have a precise idea of what staging this opera implied.
For example, during the martial music when Otello lands and approaches the Doge, the chorus and extras (who should take part in the procession or at least move somewhat choreographically) don’t know what to do, just floating about the stage at their ease.
The main reason why Rossini’s Otello was chosen to open the new season at the San Carlo was because it was in Naples that it premiered exactly 200 years ago. Although not everyone may be familiar with it, during most of the 19th century this opera, with its romantic, tragic atmosphere, was considered as one of Rossini’s masterpieces: a finely wrought, dramatic work with three tenors taking the main male roles and some beautiful ensembles. Unfortunately, in 1887, Verdi presented his own Otello, which replaced Rossini’s in the popular repertoire, to the joy of those who complained that Rossini had significantly altered Shakespeare’s plot.
Actually, librettist Francesco Berio di Salsa did not draw on Shakespeare’s play, but on secondary sources which assigned a more important role to Rodrigo than to Iago. The differences in the plot from Verdi’s masterpiece are apparent: among others, Rossini’s Otello and Desdemona have no exchanges as happy lovers, and Iago doesn't have a strongly characterised aria. What results may not be Rossini’s greatest score, but it is worth bringing it back to the operatic stage. There is some gorgeous music, mainly in the third act, which exudes a sense of true tragedy: Desdemona’s Willow Song is as beautiful as Verdi’s, and many passages are filled with pathos.