This welcome revival of Woolf Works confirms it to be the most important full-evening work to enter the repertoire of The Royal Ballet, thus far, in the twenty-first century. Although necessarily a programme that looks to the past for its inspiration, thematically attached to the life and selected works of Virginia Woolf, an author most prolific during the 1920s and 30s, it is very much a ballet of today, featuring an outstanding modern score by Max Richter (soon to be released on CD) and stunning designs.
Conceptually, Woolf Works sits between a full-length production and a triple bill; comprising three ballets that stand alone just as distinctly as the novels that inspired them; and, yet, it would seem inappropriate for any to be performed in isolation. The programme follows the chronology of the novels, beginning with I Now, I Then, inspired by Mrs Dalloway (1925); then Becomings, from Orlando (1928); ending with Tuesday, linked to The Waves (1931). The production begins with the only extant recording of Woolf’s voice (made by the BBC, in 1937), speaking, in the surprisingly clipped, passionless accent of middle-England, about language and the crafting of words. Tuesday is also introduced by Woolf’s words, but spoken by the actress, Gillian Anderson; being the suicide note Woolf wrote for her husband, Leonard – in March 1941 – before loading her coat pockets with stones and drowning herself in the River Ouse.
This first revival provided a renewed opportunity to appreciate the relevance of each section to the novel that inspired it. The literary association is perhaps most profound in I Now, I Then and although none of the performers are identified by character, it is possible to identify the cast of Mrs Dalloway from the sequence of events, on stage. Ravi Deepres’ grainy vintage film of bygone London splashes over the slowly revolving architecture of Ciguë’s impactful set design, presenting the scene for Clarissa Dalloway’s day, spent organising her society soirée for that evening but full of meaningful thoughts about her life. Memories of a brief lesbian flirtation are represented by a fleeting kiss; and the dislocated, exaggerated movement of Edward Watson seems absolutely right for the broken, shell-shocked war veteran, Septimus Smith, whose suicide, later in the day, parallels the insignificance of Mrs Dalloway’s party.
The relevance of the middle section to the literature that inspired it was driven more by costume, than the overt literary associations of the opening ballet; and, this despite Orlando being Woolf’s closest representation of a linear narrative. Her story of a young nobleman who lives three centuries without aging (mysteriously changing gender around the age of 30) was written as a parody of the family history of Woolf’s close friend (and occasional lover), Vita Sackville-West. It is especially remarkable for Lucy Carter’s scything architectural patterns of light, sometimes stretching out into the auditorium; and for the extraordinary costumes, designed by Moritz Junge: an elaborate, golden Elizabethan gown arranged over a farthingale (rigid cage), was worn by Eric Underwood; and Watson seemed to change costume each of the many times he returned to the stage, including golden pantaloons and a black hoop, like a modern tutu, around his waist. Which, if either, was Orlando?