Before writing a note of Gogol, composer Lera Auerbach immersed herself in the writer’s complete works and over twenty books written about him. It would take similar efforts to begin to understand this opera: taking us inside the fevered mind of its title character, Gogol is less a biographical narrative set to music than a phantasmagorical, psychological investigation. Given a virtuosic staging by director Christine Mielitz, it is also an overwhelming theatrical experience. I was never less than riveted, but as the evening wore on it became harder to relate to Gogol, even at the basic level of tortured genius sacrificing sanity on the altar of literary calling.
The opera’s three acts are divided into seven scenes which blend fact with liberal amounts of invention. Among other things, Gogol wrestles with his (and Russia’s) demons by night, obsesses over his will and funeral arrangements, gets abused by doctors (‘but I don’t drink alcohol,’ he cries; ‘all the more reason for a leeching,’ they reply), bats away bothersome suitors with disconcertingly large papier-mâché breasts, falls in love with a nymph, and undergoes a literary show trial which culminates in his death. A victim not only to his own self-doubt, Gogol is plagued throughout the opera by the demon Bes, who seems conceived as Gogol himself in one of his many altered states of consciousness, and the witch Poshlust, a personification of the Russian concept of Poshlost, which can be described in the context of this character as something insidiously seductive. The cast is rounded off with the boy Nikolka, who could be Gogol as a child - an inner child who Gogol desperately tries to protect - or something altogether less representational.
Johannes Leiacker’s set is a Siberian wasteland dotted with snow angels which look like a man (presumably Gogol) falling through midair. These patterns conceal a network of trap doors from which the cast and chorus emerge. The chorus reacts differently to Gogol in each scene, playing his inner demons, hostile church congregation, mindless public, and judge and jury – all brought to life with impressively detailed choreography from Arila Siegert. But the spectacle doesn’t stop there: a trapeze artist is suspended from the rigging, his costume turning him into something of a human glitter ball; Gogol’s nymph (played as a ballerina) is likewise suspended in midair; and a man is set on fire. The circus stunts are sensational to watch, but to what extent they add meaning to the drama is debatable. Neglecting to develop Gogol’s character does seem like a conscious choice, but makes him a hard figure to read.