After an impressive Sunday afternoon of Webern, Schubert, and Brahms, the Bamberg Symphony outdid themselves Monday evening in repertoire by Beethoven and Ives, and another Schubert symphony. Christian Zacharias again joined Maestro Jonathan Nott, this time for Beethoven’s Piano Concerto no. 4. They then concluded their appearance in Lincoln Center’s Great Performers Season with The Unanswered Question by Charles Ives and Schubert’s Symphony in B minor, “Unfinished”.
The titles of the two works heard on the second half of the program point toward inconclusiveness. Indeed, though, the most ambiguous opening of any Classical-period piano concerto (and of many more concerti, generally speaking) belongs to Beethoven’s Fourth. The piano begins with an intimate statement lasting a few bars and ending on a dominant harmony, and the orchestra then repeats the theme in a distant key before finally cadencing in G major. Everything about this, not least having the solo instrument play first, was unprecedented in 1806. The piece is full of searching: the slow movement is a dialogue between the orchestra and piano (fate versus free will, in one interpretation), fraught with drama and resolving into hopelessness after a mere few minutes of struggle; and the finale jovially explores the wrong-key effect of the first movement, with Beethoven now laughing at his earlier poignancy.
A fragmentary nature unites the Ives and Schubert pieces performed. The Unanswered Question conjures up a tranquil, dreamlike state and ultimately fades back into the silence from whence it came, no more resolved than at the outset (and perhaps less so). And although Schubert had six years left to live, he never returned to the score of his Symphony in B minor to complete the final two movements. That being said, this music is too lovely to ignore and has long been one of his most popular works. Besides, there’s something touching about the ending of the second movement, trailing off into serenity in much the same way as the Ives.
Mr. Zacharias favored a brisk tempo in the opening movement of the Beethoven. He sculpted phrases with the orchestra more often than he stood out in contrast to them, and his timbres in all pianistic textures found matching counterparts in the orchestra. He and Mr. Nott kept the “con moto” in the Andante con moto second movement, which is almost always taken unjustifiably slowly when compared with similar movements by Beethoven (the slow movement of the Appassionata sonata, for example). However, I would have preferred a slower tempo than the animated feeling that this more fluid pulse provoked. The concluding Vivace was comfortable and charming, with Mr. Zacharias in constant communication with the orchestra, even adding syncopated bass notes during a couple of orchestral tuttis. (Giving structural outlines with bass notes like this was common performance practice in playing Mozart concerti, mostly to aid in conducting the ensemble from the keyboard. I can’t say for sure if Mr. Zacharias was taking a liberty based on that idea, or – less likely – if there is an extant score of the concerto which incorporates these notes.)