Opera productions rouse strong passions among critics and audiences. This month we put the directors under the spotlight, discovering the process they undergo to create new stagings. Many directors also run opera companies, so we aim to find out their ideas about programming and the challenges facing the art form today.
David Pountney is currently the Artistic Director of Welsh National Opera and one of the world’s leading opera directors, whose groundbreaking work at ENO, in particular, helped shape the way opera developed in the UK in the 1980s. As Intendant at the Bregenz Festival, he was praised for combining “totally serious interpretation and a populist touch”. This spring sees WNO tour Figaro Forever, with the world première of Figaro Gets a Divorce, composed by Elena Langer, creating a Beaumarchais trilogy to follow on from the events of The Barber of Seville and The Marriage of Figaro.
For Figaro Gets a Divorce, you’ve not only commissioned a new opera, you’ve penned the libretto yourself. Why?
Well it was my idea to create the sequel and I began sketching out a scenario to see how it might work and once I had done that I realised it was much too much fun to give to anyone else!
Are you able to describe the creative process between composer and librettist on this new opera?
Elena and I worked very closely on the text, and slightly shifted around the order of scenes. She cut quite a bit of text and I made her put some back!
Your season programming is always inventive and daring – the Beaumarchais trilogy, the Donizetti Queens, or programming around a particular theme. How much fun do you have putting these seasons together and who else is involved in the planning stages?
They are basically my ideas but of course my colleagues are very involved in the practical questions that arise from repertoire choices. But yes, I do find it much more satisfying to come up with a coherent repertoire that builds ideas between different pieces.
I’ve been very interested to see in WNO’s promotional literature a brief description of the productions, i.e. a modern updating, or a production set in period. What was the thinking in sharing this information with audiences before booking? Is it something other houses should replicate, do you think?
The main reason is that some of our audiences have become increasingly interested in production details, especially the period in which it is set. Personally I don't think this should really have a bearing on whether you choose to see something or not. To me, should be ruled by an open minded curiosity rather than any predetermined dogma about how things "should" be done. But some sections of the audience have asked for this information so we provide it.