Even for a composer as naturally original as Hector Berlioz, the Grande messe des morts stands apart for its wild uniqueness. And any attempt to bring it to life in performance is bound to stand apart from the usual concert programme, starting with the sheer scale of the forces required. Well before the music started, the transformed Benaroya Hall concert stage – extended beyond its lip by several feet – made it clear that this evening with the Seattle Symphony was to be a special event.
Music director Ludovic Morlot had launched his mini-Berlioz festival the week before with Les nuits d'été (with Ian Bostridge, unusually, as the soloist, in a keenly expressive account) paired with a thoroughly gripping Symphonie fantastique. The anticipation was particularly intense for this second program, devoted solely to Berlioz's roughly 80-plus-minute setting of the Latin Requiem – if only because opportunities to encounter such a behemoth live are so rare.
In 1837, long before Mahler's titanic canvases, Berlioz scored his Requiem for an enormous complement of performers. Expanded to 109 orchestral players, the SSO was joined by 190 choristers (combined forces of the SSO Chorale prepared by Joseph Crnko, Karen P. Thomas's Seattle Pro Musica, and the young voices of Vocalpoint! Seattle).
But how unpredictably Berlioz deploys his musical army! Indeed, that sense of surprise was a recurrent theme of the performance. The special effects, originally conceived for the vastness of Paris' Les Invalides where the Requiem was first performed, were carefully prepared to make their full, thrilling impact. Morlot had brass bands positioned aloft at each of Benaroya's four corners to generate the directional, "surround-sound" Berlioz requires in the Tuba mirum, while an entire row of the stage was occupied by a team of timpanists. The entrance of the bass drum was downright shattering; Mahler's "hammerstrokes" in the Sixth seem like mere sforzandi in comparison.
Yet the high-decibel, apocalyptic flarings were not what lingered. The brass proclamations were at times too overpowering, which only brought attention to their relative paucity of musical substance. What made the deepest impression was the strange, at times quite spare, beauty of Berlioz's conception of the work as a whole. Morlot, who grew up close by the composer's childhood home and who was mentored in Berlioz interpretation by none other than Sir Colin Davis, fearlessly underscored what I can only call the weirdness of this music: its odd ruptures and splicings, peculiar rhythmic accents, deeply unsettling juxtapositions that would have given even Beethoven pause. What Berlioz does share with Beethoven – and Morlot seemed attuned to this – is in his obsessive reworking of an idea, like fingered prayer beads, until it yields some astonishingly unprecedented payoff.