Over the course of the past two weeks, American pianists Greg Anderson and Elizabeth Joy Roe have given a series of concerts and events for two pianos as part of their residency in Liverpool. These two virtuosi and Juilliard school alumni have the potential to be the new young, dynamic, fresh faces of classical music. It's a costly venture to have two pianists, never mind one, so it was a rare treat to hear a double concerto live.
Opening the proceedings with a hop across the Atlantic to New York was Bernstein’s exciting Symphonic Dances from West Side Story. This substantial opening piece, with the Royal Liverpool Philharmonic Orchestra filling the stage, was played with rhythmical precision throughout. The opening showed much promise with varied dynamics and interesting phrasing. As we progressed, the reading was perhaps overly precise, especially in the Latin sections which came across as slightly mechanical. Moments of pure tenderness were found in "There's A Place For Us" and the playing from both the brass and strings were strong throughout. Conductor Anu Tali was obviously revelling in the dances as she almost danced on the podium, however the performance lacked that last bit of Latin swing.
Before their performance Roe and Anderson addressed the audience warmly. Roe described their time in Liverpool as “enriching” and the end of it “bittersweet”. She explained that they were performing Mozart’s original orchestration of the Concerto no. 10 in E flat major for two pianos and not Bernstein’s arrangement, with cadenzas by Ernst von Dohnányi. The balance of the two pianos and orchestra was aptly managed, but throughout the concerto the playing of the strings was perhaps too heavy-handed and lacking in subtle dynamic shading. The sibling rivalry that Mozart and his sister exhibited in this concerto was evident here too. Roe stated that they would be taking on the traditional gender roles, where she played Nannerl’s part and Anderson her brother’s. The tone of the two pianists was complementary: Roe’s was bright and clear whilst Anderson’s was warm and rich. The whole piece felt very well-rehearsed, however it lacked risk, sparkle and spontaneity, which is perhaps indicative of an interpretation in its infancy.