Good programming makes for a good concert. Chosen works must fit well together, providing enough musical contrast to keep things interesting, but they must not be so different as to jar listeners with alien soundworlds. All too often, organisers whip up concerts in which any link between pieces are entirely superficial and completely amusical. A perfect example of this was Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra’s season-opening concert at Bristol’s Colston Hall, conducted by the youthful Kirill Karabits. This concert coupled Holst’s most popular work, The Planets, with Mozart’s final symphony, no. 41 in C major, “Jupiter”, two works which have absolutely nothing connecting them except the suspiciously arbitrary nickname of the latter. The resulting discrepancies left me feeling as musically confused as any Martian might have been, had she/he/it been able to get a seat in a heart-warmingly packed Colston Hall.
Good programmes are important too. Whilst the amusing error which gave Mozart a deathday of 5 December 1971 was nothing more than a forgivable typo, the fact that the programme had the Holst down to be performed first provoked my incredulity at the absurdity of such an outrageous musical decision. I was soothed by the appearance of a diminutive BSO positioned around a harpsichord (meaning Mozart), but soon irked again because the symphony’s opening was marred by the understandable whisperings of the audience, as word spread that this wasn’t, in fact, a chamber version of Mars.
So, The Administrators had conspired to get us off on the wrong foot, but things got much better. The orchestra played Mozart’s effortless, spritely melodies with beautiful lightness, and the satisfying simplicity of the imitation and regular chord progressions in the first movement was delightful. It was all fantastic fun, of a pure, Mozartean variety. A tranquil opening to the second movement led into a minor section where suspensions and pedal points provided much darker textures. The third, with its assertive rising phrases answering downward chromatic shlurps, sounded like Mozart’s take on a drinking song, and was almost as repetitive as one; although that word better applies to the finale, whose alleged magnificence supposedly accounts for the symphony’s nickname (neither invented nor endorsed by Mozart). There was little godly glory and grandeur in this performance, and so much the better: the chasing runs were all fun and games, and the winds particularly agile. But Mozart (and the orchestra) told the same jokes too many times (and with insufficient variation) and the movement became quite tedious. It was with relief that the audience applauded when finally the final chord came, and could stretch its collective legs before its journey out of this world began.