The first subscription concert of the Virginia Symphony's new season under music director JoAnn Falletta delivered vibrant tone painting in three showpieces, beginning with Tchaikovsky's symphonic fantasy Francesca da Rimini. From Onegin to Manfred to Romeo & Juliet, the theme of doomed (or illicit) love runs through numerous Tchaikovsky compositions, and Francesca falls neatly into this category. The 1876 score, which was based on Canto V of Dante's Divine Comedy, covers the emotional waterfront. Indeed, the composer's depiction of two lovers trapped in the Second Circle of Hell includes as much beauty and pathos as it does fire and brimstone.
Falletta and the orchestra took us on a hellish descent with dark, threatening brass stalking the frightened woodwinds and on into the fury of the windstorm. If anything, the quiet middle section was even more emotionally gripping. Here the love theme of Francesca and Paolo shone with affecting intensity and beauty, with the superlative VSO woodwinds (particularly clarinet, flute and bassoon) giving poignant voice to the lovers' tale.
But inevitably the music of the tempestuous opening returned – more fearsome than before – with Falletta whipping the orchestra into a frenzy as the final ten repeated chords of Tchaikovsky's score were pounded out. This remarkable VSO performance left little room for doubt that Tchaikovsky's view of intimate relationships could only ever have one result: Fate wins out.
The second piece on the program, Rachmaninov's Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini, has something of a devilish nature as well. Famed violinist Nicolò Paganini was such a virtuoso, some thought he must be possessed by Satan. Rachmaninov endorsed that narrative by including the Dies irae in his piece, and although the composition has its share of "flash and dash" – not to mention that achingly beautiful 18th variation – much of the music has dark characteristics as well.
All of these contrasts were brought out magnificently by Rachmaninov specialist Alexander Gavrylyuk in a performance that was note-perfect as well as being interpretively impressive. His bright and crisp pianism made the music gleam. In other places he was ruminative, while heart-on-sleeve romanticism wasn't neglected either, but thankfully kept in check. This is later Rachmaninov, after all – a bit leaner in expression – and Gavrylyuk's interpretation emphasized that to very good effect.
Falletta and the Virginia musicians delivered ample color and nuance, providing just the right orchestral sheen to go along with Gavrylyuk’s conception of the music. Also notable was the precise synchronization between the pianist and orchestra, something that's difficult to achieve in this particular piece.