This November, the Opéra de Montréal celebrates Verdi’s bicentennial with a laugh, presenting his comic opera Falstaff. The revival of David Gately’s production, originally produced by Glimmerglass Opera and the recently deceased New York City Opera, received no shortage of snickers during Saturday’s première performance with Opéra de Montréal.
Adapted by Verdi and his librettist Boito, Falstaff is mostly based on Shakespeare’s comedy The Merry Wives of Windsor. The overfed Falstaff is out of money and attempts to pay his bills by seducing two wealthy women, Alice Ford and Meg Page. More fat then clever, he is twice tricked by the very women he attempts to victimize, and the opera ends with the conclusion that “Tutto nel mondo è burla” (“Everything in the world is a joke”).
In an opera loaded with fat jokes and sexual innuendo, a director would have to try hard not to make audiences laugh. In that regard, Verdi and Shakespeare might deserve more credit for entertaining the audience than stage director Gately. In fact, Gately could have been more indulgent in an opera in which the title character finds himself literally tossed out with the laundry. Gately’s Falstaff, with its relatively middle-of-the-road approach to staging situational comedy, could have been more lively with more vibrant production designs.
For the first two hours of the opera, John Conklin’s sets consisted primarily of beige flats that were rearranged during noisome pauses between scenes. Though some furniture was changed, and for Act II, Scene II a staircase was added, the set remained essentially the same: a variation on the same beige flats. The costumes are done in muted tons that fade in the beige background.
The designs for the final scene of the opera, set in an “enchanted” wood, offered some relief after two hours of monochrome. With characters costumed as fairies, elves, dryads and sylphs, all dancing beneath a giant moonlit oak, the scenario is the stuff of production designer’s dreams. Conklin’s fanciful puppets à la Julie Taymor added some interest. But overall, the costumes and set fell short of the scene’s design potential. We must take into account that Conklin was no doubt financially constrained when designing this Falstaff – still, minimal designs do not necessarily need to be quite so banal.