With a debut opera for ENO in the pipeline for next year and residencies with both Wigmore Hall and the London Philharmonic Orchestra, things are currently looking bright for Julian Anderson. To celebrate this, Wigmore Hall turned 2 November into Julian Anderson Day, devoting two concerts and a talk to exploring his music. I didn’t make it to the first, but the second concert on its own showed that he is well worth all the attention.
So did the talk: Anderson’s copious experience as a university lecturer has clearly equipped him well for experiences such as this, and he guided an attentive, young-composer-filled crowd through a few of his own interests and concerns. Most striking was his welcome insistence on the openness of his music – like all music – to whatever interpretation a listener grants it: “It’s up to them to make their minds up”, he stressed, meaning listeners. Composers can intend whatever they like with a piece, but that doesn’t make others’ interpretations less valid; in fact, it’s surely this inevitable process of misunderstanding – the literary critic Harold Bloom calls it “misreading” – that keeps critical interpretation, and perhaps art generally, moving onwards.
And as far as I’m concerned, this is what Anderson’s beautiful 2009 score The Comedy of Change is about, even though according to the programme note it’s about evolution, complete with a musical depiction of Galápagos tortoises. I like my reading because interpretation is a comedy of change, and Anderson’s piece, ever changeable, seems set on defying words or easy answers. The seven movements flit by, connected and yet totally different. As soon as you try to pin it down, it’s something else. It's music on edges, between things. Not unsure of itself, but comfortable in its ambiguity.
It’s a little bit similar to the evening’s world première, Another Prayer, a smallish but serious solo violin work which is a counterpart to Prayer for solo viola. Unconventional tunings for some pitches threaten to destabilise it, but somehow all the quarter-tones and so forth integrate. There are no histrionics or flashy effects, but it’s effective and beautiful, and a worthy addition to the solo violin repertoire. András Keller's performance lacked some of the lofty serenity it may have needed, but he still sold the piece effectively enough.