It’s easiest to describe Christian Tetzlaff’s approach to playing the violin by what he isn’t trying to do. He is not trying to play as beautifully as possible, in the conventional sense. He is not trying to sound like a nightingale, soaring long, honeyed lines above an accompaniment. He is not, in other words, trying to make his violin sound as the mind’s ear instinctively thinks it should. That is too easy, after all, and it inhibits a truer sense of expression. It would be easy to misunderstand him, to take his joking line in a recent interview that “beauty is the enemy of expression” too literally. But we shouldn’t. Conventional beauty, if we can agree on what such a thing might be, needs to be held in reserve.
Why? Well, the conclusion of this final concert in 92Y’s “Contrasts” series amply answered that. As his melody rose slowly skyward in the final movement of the Quatuor pour la fin du temps, he finally deployed his purest tone, not sickly sweet or over-laden with vibrato, but somehow immaculate. Beauty, and of a particularly refined kind, turns out to be reserved in Tetzlaff’s case to praise the immortality of Jesus.
It was a fitting conclusion to a concert that asked more questions than it answered. “Contrasts” has built three recitals around Mozart’s chamber music, using it as a foil for Bartók, Messiaen, and German composer Jörg Widmann. For this performance Tetzlaff was joined by his cellist sister Tanja, Widmann on clarinet, and Alexander Lonquich at the piano.
It was two Mozart works that were performed most challengingly. We might usually judge performances of Mozart’s music by their ability to find the grace and dignity special to this composer: by that measure, the K502 Piano Trio that opened this concert would have left much to be desired. Lonquich in particular was unremittingly aggressive in the way he placed notes, whether with his left or right hands. But the playing of the two Tetzlaffs pointed to a deeper, intriguing conception of Mozart as proto-modernist, complete with short phrases, shards of melody, and sharply distinct dynamics. There was far more poise to be heard in the central slow movement, but still nothing recognizably Mozartean. That made for fascinating listening, although even listening with the kind of ears one might bring to Schoenberg Lonquich could not match the subtlety of the Tetzlaff paid. (He was not helped by a Steinway that was tuned remarkably poorly, and which further unraveled over the course of the concert.)
The K526 Violin Sonata received similar treatment. Tetzlaff here was almost submissive in his relationship to the piano, fracturing his tone and for the most part playing quietly, entirely beneath the radar, in the first movement at least. While there was more of an equal partnership in the long paragraphs of the Andante, again Tetzlaff rarely allowed his tone to open out and sing. The finale showed that if there is great potential in this kind of approach to Mozart, it stands a good chance of merely being perplexing if it doesn’t quite come off.