Rafał Blechacz is known within the piano world as the winner of the 2005 Chopin International Piano Competition (he was the first Polish pianist to win since Krystian Zimerman), but on the whole, he has kept a fairly low media profile since. Judging from his appearance at the Wigmore Hall early this new year, he seems a quiet and modest musician, and there is nothing attention-seeking about his performance, which was quite refreshing in this age of young pianists with strong “personalities”.
Blechacz brought a classic programme of Mozart, Beethoven and Chopin, which seemed to reveal a slightly conservative side to his taste. He opened the recital with a crystalline and elegant performance of Mozart’s Piano Sonata in D major, K311. It was on the whole a straightforward interpretation – he brought out transparent and well-balanced sonority and let the music flow naturally without making any strong articulations or harmonic/rhythmic emphases, although he had a slight tendency to rush the end of fast passages in the outer movements. In the second movement, which he took at a slowish tempo, he managed to create an intimate atmosphere, drawing the audience into Mozart’s delicate expressions. I almost felt that the grand piano was too blunt an instrument for this music, and his sensitive playing may suit a fortepiano better (by coincidence, there was a fortepiano at the back of the stage – probably for András Schiff’s recital the following evening).
After this elegant preamble, Blechacz plunged into the more turbulent sound world of Beethoven’s “Pathétique” Sonata. Yet here too, his approach was classical and elegant, bringing out the youthful side of Beethoven (the composer was 27 when he composed the sonata). Blechacz opened the slow introduction with an emphatic C minor chord, but the main section was taken at a swift tempo and his approach was generally straightforward and there were no idiosyncratic interpretations in phrasing or tempo. He certainly captured the youthful energy of Beethoven, but at times it felt too poised and lacking in inner drama. Perhaps he could have emphasized a bit more of the motivic elements in the development section. However, the return of the introduction in the coda was poignantly handled.