There is something fascinatingly clinical about a set of variations – the original prompt being dissected, expanded, compressed, reversed, inverted and transformed until its kinship to the initial material is all but unrecognisable. That this subtle, harmless torture should bring us pleasure is often justified by observations about the structural perfection of the genre, where a perfectly organised universe stems from a single element. Is the composer a scientist, a magician, or a sadist, then? In his latest concert at the Berlin Philharmonie, Fazıl Say left that for the audience to decide, offering a programme where arguably the most famous set of variations in music history – Bach's Goldberg Variations – and some of Say’s own works were paired in a strenuous solo recital.
Say’s mannerisms – especially in this piece – inspire obvious comparisons with Glenn Gould. However, I found Say’s gestures entirely different and individual. His heavy stomping, hand-waving, singing, and turning to the audience seemed to encourage us to participate, rather than suggesting the mischievous introversion of Gould.
His verve readily transferred to his interpretation. Malleable phrasing and an unabashedly catchy sense of rhythm prevailed over the transparent, rational approach that is often associated with Bach’s music cathedrals. Tempos were kept flexible and sometimes pushed to the extreme. Dynamic choices mostly veered towards the forte, making the few moments of piano and pianissimo all the more significant, such as the yearning melody of Variation 25. Often, the right hand flew on the higher end of the keyboard in quick, feathery passages, while the left hand pressed vehemently, almost in a conflict of timbres and harmonies. Whether Bach intended his Goldbergs to sound like this, we can’t know (probably not) and perhaps we don’t really care. At this point of the not-so-long tradition of recorded music, the Goldbergs are as much a creation of Bach as they are Say’s, Gould’s or others.