Lorin Maazel, a former director of the New York Philharmonic, brought his exacting music-making back to the podium for a nine-day guest appearance. A wizard of baton technique – even the back of his head communicates what he wants the orchestra to do – his performances leave little room for spontaneity and generally contain odd interpretive choices. Today was no exception.
Eine Alpensinfonie is the last and largest of Strauss’s tone poems, nearly an hour of music divided into 24 sections depicting a day spent climbing the alps: sunrise, a mountain ascent, passing waterfalls, glaciers, and pastures, the summit, an afternoon storm, and sunset. The work calls for a huge orchestra, including 12 horns offstage and the rare, oboe-like heckelphone.
Strauss’s diaries reveal that he began sketching Eine Alpensinfonie in response to the suicide of the artist Karl-Stauffer Bern, and took up the work again upon the untimely death of his friend Gustav Mahler. Drawing inspiration from Nietzsche, he initially titled the work “The Antichrist - An Alpine Symphony,” to express his conviction that mankind would achieve “moral purification” not through Christianity, but by “one’s own strength” and the “worship of glorious eternal nature.” Strauss dropped these references, but the intensity of the music demonstrates that Eine Alpensinfonie is not merely a picture postcard.
The Philharmonic did justice to the music’s virtuoso elements. In the fortissimo sections, the orchestra had immense power and volume coupled with great clarity in Strauss’s complex counterpoint, never becoming coarse, brash, or muddy. The strings were alternately warm or cold and glassy as the moment required, while the brasses were always firm and solid without losing blend across the section.
As for Maazel, he is also a virtuoso technician of the baton, clearly communicating every nuance of tempo, phrasing, or dynamics that he desires. However, he sometimes chose slow tempos that lent great clarity to the music yet robbed it of forward momentum. And while he was generally content with a steady tempo, he sporadically imposed willful and unexpected tempo shifts. Everything was perfectly balanced and expertly controlled, in an interpretation that emphasized the music’s technical complexity and monumentality at the expense of spontaneity and expressive warmth. Still, with a running time some ten minutes longer than normal, Maazel’s expansiveness had simply become dragging.