Gustavo Dudamel may very well be the most visible man in Los Angeles, with his face arguably more pervasively displayed here than even the mayor’s or the current head of state’s – neither of them being terribly popular in the City of Angels as of late anyway. For pedestrians and commuters coursing through the Bunker Hill environs of the Los Angeles Philharmonic’s home, Dudamel’s visage – carefully orchestrated, so to speak, to appear sage, sensuous, yet affable – is virtually inescapable, gazing contentedly upon passersby below. It seems that one could find him virtually anywhere in Los Angeles – anywhere, that is, except the rostrum of Disney Hall.
The Los Angeles Philharmonic is already halfway through its centennial season, yet its music director, who has become a virtual synecdoche not only for the orchestra, but perhaps also for the city itself, has been strangely absent during the festivities. Last seen in October, he will only be returning briefly at the end of the month for a program of film music, then remain away once more until the very end of February. His prolonged absenteeism during such a historically important season would be fodder enough for a spin-off to a certain series of beloved children’s computer games from yesteryear: Where In The World is Gustavo Dudamel?
His absence was keenly felt last Friday in a program that culminated in Messiaen’s Turangalîla Symphony, the composer’s riotous paean to spiritual and carnal love. Making a potent impression with the score back in October 2010, hearing him lead it last week would have been a welcome opportunity to gauge his artistic development. Instead, the orchestra was once again lead by its principal guest conductor, Susanna Mälkki, who has herself become quite visible at Disney Hall recently.
The Messiaen score is exactly the sort of work that appeals to Dudamel’s strengths: it is bold, colorful, extrovert, aflame with a passion that can seem to barely be constrained within the staves of the printed score, threatening to ignite it into spontaneous combustion. Mälkki, instead, soberly poured cold water on this incendiary mixture of disquiet and ecstasy. Refusing to let the orchestra off its leash and allow it to immerse itself in the sheer headiness of Messiaen’s art at its most excessive, the edges of this wild music became seemingly couched in Nerf, its tensile eroticism met with a stiff handshake followed by an icy “good night.”
Which is not to say that Mälkki’s performance was utterly bereft of worthy qualities. Her reading of the "Jardin du sommeil d’amour" was striking, wherein the pulsing heart of the music was delicately suspended while sighings interwoven by bird call arabesques soared overhead. But the Turangalîla is more than the sum of its surface beauty: it was Messiaen’s great declaration of love (momentarily frustrated) for the score’s muse, Yvonne Loriod, as well as a roaring cry against the the ossified Boulangerian neoclassicism that had by then deeply encrusted itself into French music. Mälkki appeared to be disinterested in these details, preferring to keep a Puritan distance from the music. This was Messiaen as sober professor rather than ardent lover, rational rather than Romantic.