The BBC Philharmonic’s latest concert at Bridgewater Hall presented three contrasting works from the early part of the 20th century and one of the best known of all classical symphonies, Beethoven’s Fifth, all of which came together to produce a very satisfying evening of music.
First came Stravinsky’s Apollo, written in 1927 and 1928 (here performed in the 1947 version). The subject of this ballet is Apollo and the muses (reduced from nine to three). It is a long way from the composer’s early ballets and even his earlier “neoclassical” ballet Pulcinella. Apollo is scored for strings alone and so does not have the variety of instrumental colours which were so characteristic of the works with which Stravinsky made his reputation. Rather it is an elegant, poised score, often looking back to the Baroque period – and specifically the French Baroque. Despite the general coolness it still has moments of warmth and melody. The strings of the BBC Philharmonic under conductor Nicholas Collon brought it off splendidly with a stylish performance.
Sibelius wrote a number of works for violin and orchestra apart from his ever-popular Violin Concerto, but few of them get concert performances. It was therefore a pleasure to have the opportunity to hear the Six Humoresques played by eminent Canadian violinist James Ehnes. Sibelius’ son-in-law stated that the six short pieces were intended to form a suite even though they were assigned by the publisher to two different opus numbers. They were written in 1917 and 1918 but they do not give any indications of the difficulties facing the composer as the result of the First World War and the Finnish Civil War. Sibelius’ biographer Erik Tawastjerna wrote that in the Humoresques the composer “captured the lyrical, dancing soul of the violin”. They cover a range of moods but are predominantly cheerful. Humoresque no. 5 has a memorable catchy tune. Ehnes is a thoughtful performer and while he made the most of the opportunities to display his virtuosity in, for example, the Humoresque no. 2 and the more substantial No. 3 his playing was never flashy but firmly connected with the orchestra. He captured to perfection the delicacy required in the fourth. If there is a difficulty with these pieces it is that each one leaves us wishing for more. Nos. 1 and 6 in particular seemed to stop abruptly.