As far as season openers go, a revival of Gluck’s Orfeo ed Euridice is an interesting choice. The first of Gluck’s “reform” operas, Orfeo eschews vocal pyrotechnics and long da capo arias in favour of simpler music that helps forward the drama. Still, Orfeo is a relatively modest undertaking, with only three main characters and a running time shorter than the first acts of several Wagner operas. It does, however, provide ample opportunity for dance, and in his production, director and choreographer Jo Strømgren attempts to bring the two art forms together.
As a choreographer, Strømgren is known for his irreverent ballets, often with a satirical or at least comical edge. As an opera director, his deftly humorous approach is still very much evident, and dance is very much the unifying theme of the production. For an opera like Orfeo ed Euridice, that approach makes sense: musically, since so much of the opera consists of dances, but also dramatically. Strømgren imagines the corps de ballet as a second chorus – where the singing chorus is human, mortal, the dancing chorus is godly, immortal.
Strømgren’s Orfeo is a wry musing on death and travel. It opens in a hospital, the already dead Euridice being prepared for her autopsy and with the head pathologist eating his lunch right next to her. While we might object to such unhygienic behaviour today, Strømgren gets away with it by setting his production in the 1950s, a simpler time with (presumably) fewer concerns about food and dead bodies. The opera chorus form the mourners, flocking around Euridice’s corpse, while the hospital staff is made up of dancers, ever trying to guide Orfeo.
When Orfeo begins his descent into the underworld, accompanied by Amore, they first arrive in the departure lounge of Erebus Airlines, a depressing waiting room filled with still-standing people, waiting to be taken to some – any – afterlife. The rest of the production sees Strømgren similarly occupied with waiting, be it for a journey or for life itself. I did at times wish for the production to be slightly less concerned with keeping the chuckles coming, yet luckily, the insistence upon humour never became grating.
Gluck wrote the role of Orfeo for the castrato Gaetano Guadagni, a singer widely acclaimed in the mid-18th century for a purity and simplicity of voice, and a powerful lower register. While David Hansen does have a beautiful voice, his bottom register was lacking in power and often swallowed by the orchestra. Hansen fared considerably better in the higher-lying passages, even interpolating a couple ringing high notes. The opera is essentially a showcase for the countertenor, and while Hansen’s characterisation and acting managed to carry the show, the vocal performance never really took off.